
AIM’s
Kincaid: Media Matters and Maddow –
“a lesbian with hair so
short that she looks like a man”
– responsible for The
Situation’s poor ratings
Accuracy in Media (AIM) editor
Cliff Kincaid blamed Media Matters for America and regular guest
Rachel Maddow for the lagging
ratings of MSNBC's The Situation with Tucker Carlson. MSNBC has announced
that Carlson's show will lose its prime-time slot and move to 11 p.m. ET. In his August 1 column
posted on AIM's website, Kincaid correctly noted
that The Situation is averaging only 200,000 viewers per night, but
suggested that the show's unpopularity was not the fault of its host. Kincaid
lamented, "The problem with the Carlson show is the format, which places
too much emphasis on his guests, including a regular named Rachel Maddow," an Air America Radio host
whom he described as "a lesbian with hair so short that she looks like a
man." Kincaid went on to claim that Media Matters
"dictated" the show's format by writing a letter to MSNBC president
Rick Kaplan encouraging the network "to allow some progressive voices to
be heard" on Carlson's show. "This is apparently how Maddow got to be a regular," Kincaid wrote. While Media Matters did
send a letter
on June 6 to Kaplan noting the heavily conservative slant of MSNBC's
prime-time lineup and asking for balance on Carlson's show, the letter
specifically pointed out that "a discussion between two conservatives
and one progressive is not 'balanced.' " Given
that The Situation's initial format was precisely the one that Media
Matters recommended against -- consisting of Carlson with Maddow and a second conservative, Jay Severin -- it can hardly be said that we
"dictated" the show's format. Though Severin
has since left
the show, The Situation has continued to pit Maddow
against Carlson and another conservative on several occasions. During the
week of July 25, conservatives Monica
Crowley and G. Gordon Liddy were among the guests who appeared alongside
Carlson for the majority of the program. Despite the ongoing conservative
tilt on The Situation, Kincaid insisted that the show "is so
fast-paced and diluted by liberals that it does not allow for Carlson or
anybody else to present a consistent conservative point of view" and
that its "poor ratings should be seen as a verdict on the appeal of Maddow rather than Carlson." From Kincaid's August 1 column: Carlson was dumped from prime time
because of ratings pressure. But MSNBC President Rick Kaplan explained the
switch by saying, "The fast-paced style of 'The Situation' is best
suited for a late-night audience." This makes no sense. When Cosby was
hired, MSNBC claimed that her program was "in development" and
would debut sometime near the end of the year. Clearly, she was given the 9
p.m. time slot because Kaplan decided that they could not continue with the
numbers generated by "The Situation," averaging only about 200,000
viewers per show. But that's his fault, not Carlson's. The problem with the Carlson show
is the format, which places too much emphasis on his guests, including a
regular named Rachel Maddow, a radio host on Air The format was dictated by Media
Matters, a left-wing media "watchdog" group, whose sole purpose in
life seems to be to stifle conservative media voices. After MSNBC's deal with
Carlson was announced, it wrote to Kaplan worrying about the prospect of
"adding yet another conservative as sole host of a prime-time
show." The
group, led by homosexual conservative-turned-liberal David Brock, urged
Kaplan to "allow some progressive voices to be heard" on Carlson's
show. This is apparently how Maddow got to be a
regular. [...] The point is that the show, as
currently designed, is so fast-paced and diluted by liberals that it does not
allow for Carlson or anybody else to present a consistent conservative point
of view. If anything, the show's poor ratings should be seen as a verdict on
the appeal of Maddow rather than Carlson. —J.S. |
Back to Articles
![]()
Home | Bio | Forum | Blog | Media | Fan Resources | Contact